Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - FarleyCZ

Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 34
451
Sound Design / Re: Running audio through cassette tape form warmth HELP
« on: January 13, 2016, 08:26:08 pm »
Try U-He's Satin. Best tape emulation I've heard. It doesnť blow you right away like for example Wintage Warmer, but I remember how old cassete recordings played by old walkmans sounded when I was a kid and Satin can get it pretty on point. If you like it, then you may think about buying a hardware machine.

...having said that, you have to remember those things:

- The good recorder is extremely expansive.
- Tapes are expansive too today and they wear off, so you have to buy new ones every now or then. No way around it.
- Effects it adds is wobbly frequency response with low mids bump, a slightly resonant highend (depends on high-emphasis circuits), wow & flutter (pitchmodulation caused by motor speed not being totally stable), saturation and sometimes width expansion. None of these effects is "warm" on it's own. It's the combination. Point is, you can make those effects yourself. During mixdown (per channel if you want) or on the synthesiser itself during sounddesign. It'll cost you nothing and you can preserve some clean elements for a nice fresh contrast. :)

Also museumoftechno's post is right. Don't consider it a processor. It's the old and slow way. Record it 1:1 and play it back 1:1. :)

452
Inspiration/Creativity/Motivation / Re: What/Who inspired you to start?
« on: January 11, 2016, 09:43:55 pm »
So much good stories. We need a lame one. Here it goes:

I was into movie effects! :D Like ... really bad. Watched DVD extrtas, documentaries, got into 3D modeling, compositing, making reaaaaallllyyyy lame little videos with my friends. Few of them are still there, DON'T !!! ... try to google them, or I'll hunt you down and torture you! :D

...but then, i was like 16, doctors told me I'm partially color blind. That explained some stuff but also crushed that dream quite heavily. A colorblind graphics guy? Yeah right. I was too dumb for serious programming, so I searched what else cool can I do with a computer. Downloaded FL studio, drew few notes, sounded terrible, closed it and didn't touch it for like a year or two. :D

Then I got into listening to electronic music. ATB in paticular. That Trilogy album is still cool imho. :) I saw some footage from his studio and thought, wait a minute, I was experimenting with this stuff back then. Lemme try again. But I took it properly this time. Reading Wiki on Opera Mini on my old T630 phone during classes, learning about notes, intervals, chords, scales. Essentially trying to understand some theory first. I didn't have any music lessons as a kid, so this was kinda challenge. ...but I've learned thing or two. :) Then forum time era along. Trance.nu. Listening to old good Tiesto and Armin and PvD compilations back in 2008 - 2011. Anjunabeats then. Matt Lange, Andrew Bayer, A&B of course. So much to aspire to.

Definitely Airbase, everything he made back in the days was superb.
RIIIGHT?!?!?! :)

...well and it kinda stayed with me, this hobby. Now I try to fit in to that all mr.SuicideSheep / Liquicity territory. Loving guys like Ramesses B, MitiS, KOAN Sound, Sorrow, Etherwood. Those inspire me today. :)

Hope it wasn't boring too much. :D

453
I think this provides some good insight on the matter as well: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=544781152237225&id=118480138200664
Yeah this part:
Quote
What this means in practice is that the LU-meter in itself is a superb tool for measuring perceived loudness of any type of audio material but implementing the standard reference level of 0LU is pretty pointless before all physical media is gone and all types of online streaming and media playback such as Spotify, iTunes, YouTube, Media Player, VLC etc… gets a built-in LU analyzer and conforms to this standard playback level without deviation. Until then, people can do a bit as they please and we're still going to have the "loudness wars" happening in one form or another, since louder will always be better.
...essentially confirms what I thought about it.

454
Inspiration/Creativity/Motivation / What keeps you positive?
« on: January 11, 2016, 09:02:58 pm »
Ok, guys, sorry If I turn the vibe down a bit, but ... I kinda can't hold it.

I think I might not be the only one here who felt in love with this hobby some years ago. It's awesome hobby, probably coolest there can be, but sometimes it has it's dark sides. (Vader jokes in 3...2..1... :D) What I mean by that is, eventhough it's first and foremost about the music, about the emotions, you can't stop the world around you. Trust me, I've tried.

First two or three years it's so cool. You work on your new hobby. BTTF shit. You're life's completely unwritten. Who the hell knows what it might lead to? So liberating from the real world ... and cool at the same time.

The next three years, you start to doubt, if you just didn't find a right source of information to learn from, or if you're just useless. Especially as younger guys then you start to appear with songs you'd kill for to be able to make. (That one really hurts at the time.) ...the hobby's still really cool. But the lifes starts to throw some reality checks in your way. Colledge, uni, life plans, money... Everything somehow connects back to the hobby. You need time for it, place for it, some gear for it. Also your friends invest their life in different hobbies, doing well. But damn. That piano, that synth, it always works right? It gets you out of everything.

But then another two years pass and ... your friends still support you, but not becouse your hobby is cool anymore. It's becouse it's just you now. That unwritten life starts to define itself pretty clearly. You're that guy, who tries to produce for years, who's never satisfied with himself. That's just it. And what's worst, sometimes even that piano and synths don't cure it anymore. Believing in your own stuff becomes hard, becouse you know you're gonna listen to it few years later and cringe. You start to procrastinate from the hobby you've put a big chunk of your life into. ...and that sucks, becouse you know it can make you happy. It just isn't that frequent anymore...

If anybody's been through something like this ... what got you out of it? Becouse I feel like i need to find something ASAP.

...also, for the newbies: That saying: Keep your feet on the ground and eyes in the skies. Don't forget about the feet part. It might kinda hurt in the future.

455
Do I think this might ever succeed? Probably not. It would require all syndications to get together, establish this new metering standard, educate their clients about it, and then have it implemented. That sounds like way too much work when the status quo is too easy to maintain.
That's the confusing part. R128 is here, it's done and TVs work with it. Some radios too. I heard they really insist on it in Germany. Implementation is actually easy. Everyone of us have this meter already in oZone. :D (You have to turn it on though.) ...or you can find some pretty cool free ones. But it somehow ... didn't catch on. I wonder why. :D

456
R&A Graveyard / Re: Soundcloud track in signatures - please no
« on: January 11, 2016, 07:53:03 pm »
I'm with ion here. It's big rectangle with orange elements on blue background. Hard to ignore. Also, the person will probably listen to your track for the time he reads one page of the thread anyway. It gets you the play count, yeah, but .... dunno.

457
Mixing/Mastering / Would you even consider R128 instead of brickwalling?
« on: January 11, 2016, 07:29:34 pm »
I've got into funny conversation lately, where few people midlessly advocated EBU R128 loudness metering recomandation. I was trying to prove them wrong, but it got me thinking... It's pretty obvious and audible that however all kinds of organizations tried to end the loudness war, they failed. But seeing few big industry names on this forum, I can't help but wonder: How heavily is this brickwalling train rolling? If radios got together and said: Ok, guys, we're not longer accepting heavily limited -5 RMS records, from now on we want clean neat -23LUFS stuff. (LUFS means dBFS +- some frequency weightening)

Would like that idea? Do you think this might ever succeed? Or does "limited" mean just "modern" and it's here to stay?

...also, if you are against loudness war too, do you thing R128 is right weapon against it? Or K-Weightening?

458
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Perceived Loudness
« on: January 11, 2016, 07:03:05 pm »
...or read something about fletcher-munson curves and you'll get how they do it. Also you'll kinda understand why it's a sh**ty thing to do. :D

459
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Why is mixing in -dbs?
« on: January 11, 2016, 03:10:52 pm »
I believe the logical reason is this:
When you make a track, you have no idea about how loud it will be played back by the listener. But you need some kind of relative measure, so they came up with this idea to take a maximum amplitude for the signal distribution (+- 1 volt I think, 16/24/32 bits digitally), name it 0db and base every measuremet out of it. (Thus logically you go down.) That maximum is in the end controlled by a listener's volume knob. (When he sets the volume to 100db, your -5db peaking track will be 95db loud in reality.)

460
Sound Design / Re: How do I pull the vocals out of a finished song?
« on: January 09, 2016, 09:50:04 pm »
iZotope was developing something for extraction without phase invert in the past, but it went silent. I guess it just wasn't reliable enough.

461
Sound Design / Re: Dune 2 Synth
« on: January 09, 2016, 09:48:19 pm »
It's as good or better than Sylenth1, Massive, or Serum. Seriously!
...naah. Depends on the purpose. I have DUNE 2 and love it. It really kick Sylenth a** sometimes. No point in comparing it to Massive and Serum as they're better for different kind of sounds.

But have to admit, I didn't expect to like Dune 2 that much when buying it. Really great synth.

462
If you give one of these a pre-delay of 8 ms and give the other layer a post-delay of 8 ms it will sound waaaaay wider.
...and then you play the track in mono and get ugly phasing. I'd try to detune them diffrently. :)

463
Also, world isn't black or white. A lot of people think about "learning the theory" as something you do once and then you just know it for the rest of your life. ...like driving. But it's not like that. You slowly get to know the basic and then discover new and new things, types of chords, scales, intervals in certain contexts and so on. It's more like cooking. You learn it continuousely all the time. So yeah, some theory can help you with transcribing the feeling, but don't think about it as a finite skill. That sense of discovery is one of that emotion too actually, one that you're probably transcribing right now anyway. :)

464
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Panning Different intances L & R
« on: January 09, 2016, 02:14:01 am »
There's amazing chapter about it in one of the Owsinsi's book. Imagine it as a theatre play. Each instrument is an actor. If you leave all the instruments in the middle, they stand in line, so you can't see some of them properly. If you hard-pan everything, then you have two lines of actors on each side of the stage. Still wrong. It can lead to "big mono" effect, essentially having so much stereo information your ears give up on figuring out the soundstage. What you want is to make the stage somehow interesting. Place them incrementally around the stage. :)

465
I have massive problems with this. There are those cool whiles when I'm motivated. ...but they are not long enough to finish a track in them. So I hit the wall too and try and try, which eventually ends up in not screwing up just the project I work on, but also the other projects I try to run away to for a change. ...that ends up in depression that lasts exactly until I experience somethimg motivating again. ...and again it goes. I wish I knew a way out of it. There are some cool advices here, guys. Will try some, thanks.

Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 34