Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bertie South

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 18
181
WIPs / Re: Trance 2.0 Track
« on: January 21, 2016, 07:59:45 pm »
 ¯\_()_/¯ I'm in the 'not working for me' camp

182
Finished Tracks / Re: Experimental hip hop // Future Jazz
« on: January 21, 2016, 03:08:25 pm »
He's right y'know..

183
This is quality man. Props

184
WIPs / Re: Deep Progressive House WIP
« on: January 20, 2016, 10:55:23 pm »
Hey,


I like this overall, here's a couple of things I would do:


Do something different with that vocal snippet. Maybe use a delay of 3/4 beat instead of 1 beat and use an LFO to filter and/or pan it, something like that.


I would lose or change the last couple of notes from that piano hook, but that's just me. When I first listened, it seemed to come in from the same stereo position and frequency range as that arpeggio too.


That riser in the build-up sounds a bit harsh (or at least the way it jumps straight in). Something softer might fit better with the rest of the track.


Those things aside though, I like where this track is going. I like the bassline progression, and the use of modulation and subtle effects. It needs a few more things going on to feel like a complete track, but it's off to a good start. Reminds me of some of my favourite bits on Anjunadeep.

185
R&A Graveyard / Bug with posting replies
« on: January 20, 2016, 05:23:16 pm »
If like me you enjoy laboring over long, flowery replies and tweaking them until they're just right, something fucky happens with the formatting if you fiddle with your message too much. When you go to post/preview your message, a chunk is missing from the bottom, and in its place is a load of underscores or something, and a bunch of [size] close tags. S'pose I should have grabbed a screen cap the last time it happened.. will post one up if it happens again.


The reply box occasionally does other weird things, like if you add in a blank line but later remove it, all the text below shrinks.

186
Inspiration/Creativity/Motivation / Re: [TL;DR] Musicianship
« on: January 20, 2016, 05:13:31 pm »




(For example, "lyrics" might seem totally subjective but a band that just sings about girls and partying will probably get a lower score than a band that sings about more sophisticated ideas.)


For sure. For me it's more about how lyrics explore a subject than the subject itself. Coldplay's lyrics for example make me nauseous and occasionally irate (ditto all other music that sounds like it was written for bedwetters and crybabies), but on the other hand I think Smashing Pumpkin's Mellon Collie is a great album, even though I'd be hard pressed to say what exactly is different about the lyrics. On the whole I prefer instrumental stuff tbh. And again that's part of why I'm drawn to a lot of (vocal-free) dance music.




Yup. This is a well-documented aspect of the psychology of decision-making. If I expand my spreadsheet a lot and it still has no predictive power, then I'll have to conclude that my tastes have no pattern and are based on my idiosyncrasies.


Well good luck. I'm convinced there are some patterns there so I hope you find some


187
WIPs / Re: neuro dub
« on: January 20, 2016, 01:35:20 pm »
^ Agree about the mid bass. The sub is probably a bit high in the mix, so trim that a bit but layer it up, maybe with something an octave above or a melody that follows the same notes. I'd go for something subtle, as I like the character that bass has at the minute, but it needs a bit more presence in the higher frequencies.


Cool tune though!

188
WIPs / Re: wip - need feedback
« on: January 20, 2016, 01:12:07 pm »
I like this man. The sub is about right in the mix I think (in my headphones anyway). I'm not totally sold on that snare sound, but maybe it just needs to come down in the mix a little

189
WIPs / Re: Progressive House WIP - need feedback.
« on: January 20, 2016, 01:02:49 pm »
I think the synths need to come down in the mix a little. Also the last lower note on that synth riff (at 2:26 and 2:33 for example) is clashing with the others.


More generally, the track is a bit bare as matey said above. It needs moar things. I like that bassline though, and the beats are solid.

190
WIPs / Re: Chill song WIP (Need li'l feedback)
« on: January 20, 2016, 12:54:11 pm »
Link isn't working brah

191
^ Finding someone to collaborate with is a good shout

192
I was stuck in this same rut a few years back. I'd give up on production, then I'd come back to it, then I'd give up on it again, over and over until I basically gave up on it for good and spent years making barely anything. I'm just gonna throw out a bunch of thoughts about my experience and maybe you'll find something you relate to.


1) I was too self-conscious about how much I sucked and how novice I was. I worked mostly using monitors, so anybody who was around could hear my amateur attempts at everything. I didn't have the confidence not to let that get to me. I sold my monitors way back so I do everything in headphones these days, then take my stuff to try out on a mate's system once it's starting to shape up.


2) Everybody sucks at first. It's easy to think that people who put out amazing music have some kind of innate gift. Not true. It's just that you only hear of them once they get good enough to make release-quality music. Every artist who consistently pumps out good music has spent thousands of hours 'sanding the edges off their sucking', to quote an article I like. These days I don't believe in the idea of 'natural talent' at all. I used to, but I think I was just giving myself excuses not to try and improve.


3) You'll get demotivated easily if a) you don't have the right level of challenge; b) you don't get feedback, or can't understand the feedback you're getting (from your ears, from other people or wherever); c) you don't feel like you're learning anything or making progress. Setting your sights on making amazing music out of the box will instantly demotivate you. The challenge is too big, and until you learn enough about making music, the differences you hear between what you make and what you want to make won't mean anything to you. Start at the bottom and take it one step at a time. Have big goals, but work with tiny challenges to get there. Maybe learn music theory. Then learn synthesis. Try and do things in some kind of logical order and have the patience not to get distracted by things like mixing and mastering if you're still getting to grips with the basics. And never stop learning.


4) Following on from the above point, and as I said elsewhere: focus. Focus, persistence and patience. Saint-like levels of patience.


5) I used to think (without even really realising it) that because I had good ideas, that meant I would make good tracks. When I didn't, I got disillusioned and bored because I wasn't getting results as quickly as I thought I should. Being able to execute is much more important than having ideas. People come up with great ideas all the time that they do nothing with. Don't pat yourself on the back just because you're coming up with ideas. Everybody does it. Great producers are the ones who are able to execute well.


6) At some level, confidence and belief in yourself is important, because without it you won't have the determination needed to keep at it. I'm reluctant to say something that's so self-evident while also being utterly impractical as advice goes, but it does matter.


Good luck!

193
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Sticking to one main volume/pan position per track
« on: January 20, 2016, 11:56:03 am »

What drives me crazy in Ableton, and maybe Im doing it wrong, but when you select a group of automations to move, it doesnt do them precisely. If all are on an even db, say -10db and others at -15dn & -12db on one track, when I move them they adjust weird. I want it to move them all 5db or whatever and they will be from say -10db to -14.33 instead of going from -10db to -15db. Drives me nuts.
I've been wondering about scaling volumes at different levels and how DAWs handle this.


To use an extreme example, imagine you have an automated fade from -36dB to -30dB. That's a pretty subtle difference. If you select the two automation points and drag the -30dB point up to 0dB, depending on how your DAW handles it the other point will now be at -6dB (this is what Logic does anyway). -6dB to 0dB is a BIG difference, so you can't alter the overall volume of the track without affecting its balance. It *might* be that Ableton is actually adjusting your automation to compensate for this difference. I don't know the maths of it though (maybe somebody does?)

194
Mixing/Mastering / Re: The Mono Build Trick
« on: January 20, 2016, 11:30:38 am »
I've used this before... some thoughts:

-If done quickly, it sounds bad
Interesting, can you explain a bit more about this? I've been using some fairly rapid mono-stereo transitions to enhance certain sounds, just wondering if I should avoid that trick.. cheers

195
Sound Design / Re: foley/field recordings
« on: January 19, 2016, 12:21:29 pm »
I really like the idea of recording random ambience and using it in production. Gonna bag myself one of those Zooms when I have the cash.


At the Laribal Gardens in Barcelona some of the stairways have these mini waterfalls that make this cool bubbling sound. I recorded some on my phone but then, true to Barcelona's reputation, my phone got stolen.


This is the thing I'm talking about if anybody is around Barcelona though: http://www.barcelonalowdown.com/barcelona-lowdown/uploads/2014/07/Generalife-Steps-Montjuic-Barcelona.jpg

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 18