Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Marrow Machines

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 53
271
3 years in and I'm actually really confident and happy with my production skills,  but arrangement and composition is a pitfall for me. I've spent a majority of my time honing production techniques, and I think that makes it way easier to get my ideas down, but I wish I would've spent a lot more time working on composition

Good time to start is now!!!!!


I will say, transitioning into a balanced knowledge and understanding is one of the more difficult things to do with your life and skills you will acquire as you grow.

Just understand that learning sucks, and it's a tough road regardless.

might of said this before, but my calculus 2 teacher describe how she went through graduate school.

"you do a little of this and a little of that. get frustrated and walk away. come back at it again, and get frustrated again. you may end up with an answer or you may not. you may even end up working at mcdonalds, instead of doing your work! but you gotta come back to it, and finish it. it's not easy..."

bit of a paraphrase and quotes (probably can say that lol)


embrace the suck, become the suck. then get back to work!

272
6 years and after a few essential upgrades to my monitoring.

Though, not with out exploration and some investment into my sound.

i've always liked my tracks i worked on, but i feel better about what i make and how i make my tracks.

Yeah, in the moment, when I'm making the track, I can't help but to like it, the problem is when I get out of my DAW and hear some "pro" songs, suddenly the bad quality of my songs becomes very palpable, and I kinda feel discouraged to continue.

And I understand that investment is part of it. I'm currently using Sennheiser's HD-202 as monitors, but just until I earn enough to buy a pair of Yamaha's Hs7.

Thx for replying btw =D

np. it's good to consider how they get things, but ultimately they have the resources and the time to be able to dedicate to activities.

It also probably started out as fun and maybe eventually turned into work for them.

Always good to gut check yourself every now and again!

273
6 years and after a few essential upgrades to my monitoring.

Though, not with out exploration and some investment into my sound.

i've always liked my tracks i worked on, but i feel better about what i make and how i make my tracks.

274
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Soundcloud subscription
« on: May 22, 2016, 10:02:16 pm »
if you're making original music, i don't see why would get your music taken down?

unless you have some unauthorized samples....
well the thing is SC is so lazy they take down anything with similar name too sometimes :D I read somewhere that some guy uploaded silent track and named it the same as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4%E2%80%B233%E2%80%B3 and it was taken down by copyright notice :D ridiculous...

that's different then....

275
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Soundcloud subscription
« on: May 22, 2016, 08:12:38 pm »
if you're making original music, i don't see why would get your music taken down?

unless you have some unauthorized samples....

276
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Izotope?
« on: May 22, 2016, 01:11:51 am »
hah this is coming into interrogation :D

Yes, I put Maximus exclusively on master channel, 99% of the time when I want to saturate the sound, otherwise I use Waves L2 for traditional limiting. I think I'm not going after a "commercial" sound, I use it on songs that I don't want to sound clean - most of the time sampled stuff and synthwave (80s cheesy shit :D )
https://soundcloud.com/itsdaimon/synthwave-thunder-lighting/s-HqYE4 here is the synthwave track I've been working on with maximus on master, it has that dirty compressed sound to it (at least for me)

I can't tell on consumers, but it i can see how a slight bit of dirt would appeal to this track.

Not so much so that you can hear it, but enough to give it some characteristic.

Thanks for helping understand why some one would want to push things a little hard to get a certain plug in characteristic in mastering.


277
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Izotope?
« on: May 21, 2016, 05:57:42 pm »
How much coloration is occurring and at what point does the coloration occur?

are you buying it for the tool or the color?
to get the color you need to crank things a bit up (by the way, "famous" Soundgoodizer is just a preset from Maximus), otherwise if you don't go crazy on the knobs it acts as a standard limiter. After Maximus I noticed it added a nice warm to mid and higher bass. I don't know if I would buy it on it's own for saturation it adds, but it comes with Producer bundle of FL Studio

ok so considering the coloration from the plugin, that would effect the master output.

Would you want to extend to a point of coloration or some level of coloration on your master?

Does this coloration relate to achieving commercial loudness?

Should loudness and coloration be considered in your masters?

I understand the what would consider being "commercial", but i don't understand if there's a need for that to be the average reference point for the consumers.

Unless there's literally so much ambient noise that you NEED that whole BS.

278
honestly this is one area you don't want to skimp. don't just buy 'budget' speakers and then want new and better ones in 6 months. It is what I did. I really wanted the Adam speakers but then just went with HS8 instead (still a respectable speaker for a bedroom studio) but I was kicking myself because I always wanted the Adams.

Seriously just go without speakers for longer and get a good quality pair - you will have them for years and years anyway. Just don't go out or spend money on shit for a few weeks and put that money aside for better speakers.

my recommendation from all the ones I listened to in the shop were definitely the Adams.

I also have KRK rokit 8s and they are good but like any speaker you have to learn how to mix on them specifically - they can be a little boomy down the bottom end I think.

i'd give you +1 for the advice, but i already gave you +1 on another post...

279
You Might Like... / Look it's dat boi!
« on: May 21, 2016, 06:21:02 am »
Oh shit whaddup?

https://vantagenoise.bandcamp.com/album/dat-boi


For your health.

280
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Izotope?
« on: May 20, 2016, 08:25:13 pm »
How much coloration is occurring and at what point does the coloration occur?

are you buying it for the tool or the color?

281
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Izotope?
« on: May 20, 2016, 06:08:29 pm »
ohhhhh, what i'm saying is that nobody would actually pay thousands for them if they were the same...
i'm not suggesting that price equals quality, just that there are obviously differences if people are paying a shit tonne of money for them

quote clean up...

glad we're on the same page.

yes but what would make the price point be considered that much money and why would people consider aiming to have those plug ins?

who tf cares...  ::)

ilok cares about the little drummer bois

oh shit whaddup?

282
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Izotope?
« on: May 19, 2016, 05:27:26 pm »
ohhhhh, what i'm saying is that nobody would actually pay thousands for them if they were the same...
i'm not suggesting that price equals quality, just that there are obviously differences if people are paying a shit tonne of money for them

quote clean up...

glad we're on the same page.

yes but what would make the price point be considered that much money and why would people consider aiming to have those plug ins?

283
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Izotope?
« on: May 19, 2016, 04:07:34 pm »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

sounded the same or production costs.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=production%20costs

wut?
What?

quote ception

i'm still not really sure what your getting at, lol

you're talking about price and quality, when the price could just be a factor of production costs. IE, the cost that goes into making the product.

You'd want to think that the higher cost means quality, but that could just be a factor of the production side.

284
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Masterbus Frequency Cuts
« on: May 19, 2016, 05:36:56 am »
cassette tapes cut off at 16khz, and like 50hz(questionable for my knowledge)

285
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Mixing For Loudness
« on: May 19, 2016, 03:07:19 am »
How do you go about making a dense mix loud?

By removing sounds from your mix so it isn't as dense. The more sounds, the less headroom. The less headroom, the quieter the final mix.

this

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 53