Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Babasmas

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1
Finished Tracks / [Drumstep x Rock Guitars] Babasmas & Fel - Run
« on: January 29, 2017, 09:21:33 am »
Hey,

My friend and I have made a second track together.

Hope you'll like it !

2
I'm in. (Not sure i'll make it but I'll try anyway.)

3
WIPs / Re: [Liquid DnB] ...extremely melodic thingy.
« on: June 14, 2016, 08:41:27 am »
Heyo,

I really like this. The overall atmosphere and ambiance of the track makes it really powerfull. Lots of emotions are telled here. i don't like the switch at 3:05. It kinda destroy the atmosphere of the beginning. It also feel like it's dissonant. You have a lot of very good elements. The way you put everything together is weird but it work very well. (Like the lead appearing at 3:14, i really like it.)

There's some things that are destroying my ears tho. In the beginning, you have a really high wet percussion that is way too strong and pierce the high. Eq needs to be more precise on this.

At 1:33, you could have removed the beat. It's not bad but it destroy the rythme of the track. (Or only use few elements but not the entire beat)

Rest is very good. I really like this and if you doubt about it. That means it's time to release it. Take some risks, it'll pay ;)

4
WIPs / Re: hold me
« on: June 14, 2016, 08:31:08 am »
Heyo,

Firts off, nice progression. I like it. (I actually like what you have so far)

So first off, the first chords you play is way too dry. (at 0:06) Add some reverb to it, so it doesn't completely disappear. (It's not a bad idea to do such chords but it need to create atmosphere. So reverb, create a room effect.)

Then, you have 0 sub bass. You can hear it because the kick is the lowest thing played. It need a sub bass. It will give way more power to your drop. (Like 100% more)

The rest is fine. I guess. I like the overall. ;)

5
WIPs / Re: Smiling at rain
« on: June 14, 2016, 08:25:21 am »
Hey,

Nice work so far but there's more ahead.

First thing you might want to do is humanize the piano. Play with the velocity of each notes, try putting those not exactly on time, etc... other thing with the piano, it's lacking of clarity. Piano is way too mid/Low-mid, it could use some high frequency to make it clear.

Then again, with the ride, you might want to make it less static. Play with the velocities. (a lot) Kick is weak compared to the snare. Snare has a bit too much of reverb.

It's a bit slow to build to whatever you plan next. 1min30 is alot considering you're repeating the piano almost 4 times with no variation in it. (Just adding drums, doesn't make it interesting). Try adding Harmonies to the piano. Build up the chords;

Anyway, nice ideas, a lot of work is required but it can work ;)

6
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Record label question!!!! please help
« on: June 11, 2016, 10:19:07 pm »
I never said reimbursement - I said debt. Thre are plenty of articles about this, as well as documentaries.

If you assume a record label is NOT trying to take advantage of you at every opportunity, you're doomed to repeat the same mistakes other artists have made.
Alright, I can't disagree with what you're saying. i'll watch the documentary about the music industry. It seems interesting.

Although, that documentary is quite out of context here. If I understand what the video was saying, it's talking about actual recording of music. Which in the case of EDM (Few artists does records pianos, guitars, etc... but mostly in private environnement and not in expensive studios. Just look at how Sizzlebird records his violin), does not apply anymore. The only thing that cost money could be paying the distributor. (Distrokids, etc...)

But I totally understand. We just need to be carefull. We have the internet on our side. read every details of the contracts, be aware of what it says, etc...

7
You Might Like... / Re: Look it's dat boi!
« on: June 10, 2016, 09:15:24 am »
there's better for less money... (Cuz 7$ for 3 tracks...)

https://frankjavcee.bandcamp.com/album/frankjavcee-vol-1999

I'll recommend you to listen to Simpsonwave

8
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Record label question!!!! please help
« on: June 10, 2016, 09:07:30 am »
If you think your personal experience is indicative of the music industry as a whole, you're welcome to that belief.
You are the one who stated that practically everybody does this, and when I say that I have never seen this on my own behalf you come off like a know-it-all.  Well lucky me who have not encountered "practically everybody".
My experience is that the labels gamble the release cost against a percentage of rights and royalties, not lending the artist the basic cost for reimbursement later.

I'll defend mussar's perspective in sharing the knowledge that comes with understanding.

He's not a know it all, other wise his attitude might be a little different (plus you have the consider the body language context that's taken out during text)

Mussar is also studying music(and probably the business of it to some degree; either on his own in depth and at the very least in his classes), so what was given was a time and monetary investment on his part, for free.
The fact that he's studying music (and the business of it) don't prove that he's right.

i'll defend ion here. Why would a label ask for reimbursement ? I mean, it's the same a paying up-front. If you do good, everything is ok, and if you don't, it still cost you money...

i'm just sayin'. that's stupid, and it's the same. Don't signed contracts involving paying and having to pay for reimbursement. Read the small details of the contracts.

9
Composition/Arrangement/Theory / Re: EQ cuts / EQ
« on: May 20, 2016, 11:30:28 am »

10
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Izotope?
« on: May 20, 2016, 11:28:20 am »
I've used Izotope and it's cool. Easy enough to use when you understand it and it's kinda what everyone uses.

But is it really necessary ? no, absolutely not. It obviously is a fancy software. It does the job well, i agree, but there's freeware doing the same thing.

I use Flux STTools for Stereo imaging, ModernExciter for Lows and High, Fruity Limiter for compression, Parametric EQ 2 for EQing (of course) and Maximus.
Flux STTools is Free, ModernExciter is Free. Fruity stocks are includes in FL Producer Edition. They do the job on the same level than Izotope.

11
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Mixing For Loudness
« on: May 20, 2016, 11:19:03 am »
This is an important time to remind everyone that composition and orchestration are also a critical part of a good mix: the more notes happening at once and the more instruments playing at once, the more sounds are present.

Good questions to ask yourself, before trying to process your way out of this:
  • Can I simplify any of the melodies or rhythms to allow more room in the track, without compromising the musical idea?
  • Can I remove any of the instruments or layers, while maintaining the feel of a "finished" song?
  • How much fluff can I trim off of this song? What are the essential elements of this track, and what can I take away from my current arrangement to get to that?

Big Room is really loud because there's three or four sounds happening at any one time - Dat Big Kick™, Dat Percussive Lead™ or Dat Supersaw™, and maybe Dat Clap™ or Dat Ride™. Hardstyle is surprisingly quiet in comparison, because holy shit what did you do to your 909 you shouldn't pu-DONK DONK DONK DONK DONK DONK
This is important.

12
R&A Graveyard / Re: Beginners area
« on: May 20, 2016, 11:17:05 am »
I think we need a beginners area. I'm starting producing and I would love a place where I can ask stupid question to have a north! What you guys think about it?
There's no stupid question. Everything is worth asking.

Is there much demand for this? New humans to production and all? I would like to see this as well. Obviously if there is not much demand it's further along the pipe for implementation of course..
The forum is already well designed for beginners. there's sub-forums for everything. No need for a specific one about beginning.

13
Also, if you like toms

then "The Dugg Funnie Private Reverse Toms" is for you.

14
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Question About Headroom
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:43:50 am »
I always had the same thought, Lydian.

But I think there are daws that don't have the option to lower all faders at once (like FL 11)? And then people start messin with the master fader.

Headroom is important while recording analog instruments; once it's recorded too hot (distortion) or not loud enough (bad signal to noise ratio) it can't be changed.

But for people like me, only working with in the digital domain, the creation of headroom is just a fader move away.
FL 12 has the option now. Fader can be selected (more than one) and we're able to lower them all at once.

15
WIPs / Re: How's my mixdown?
« on: May 01, 2016, 08:45:44 am »
Heyo,

As Vidale say, dynamics are a bit small. Also everything seems to be very muffled. It's kinda not loud enough. try compression and Eq a bit more. (Cutting thing, like the lows in every instruments, except the bass might be a good idea.)

Also, It's missing some highs end on this. Might want to turn up a little bit the highs of you main synths.

This is nice still :D

babasmas.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16