Author Topic: Izotope?  (Read 19759 times)

from nowhere

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 42
  • Honor: 2
  • Just beginning :)
    • Alenn
    • Alenn
    • View Profile
Izotope?
« on: May 17, 2016, 11:22:32 pm »
There is any difference between mastering with IO and other plugins? I never used before and reading about it I think is just another ¨fancy software¨
It is really awesome? Really worth it?
 
I don´t know all about IO, just read some conclusions and opinions about it and maybe it has a better precision with EQ or something like that.

I would like to know your experiences with it

Lydian

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Honor: 107
  • Hi! I'm Danny! Let's talk production! :)
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2016, 03:38:36 am »
I mean... I want to say no but ozone is awesome.
A young 14 year old me with a really bad haircut. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eMbftWV75w

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2016, 05:49:46 pm »
Go listen to all the different mastering plug ins and consider the transparency.

I bought melda products because i liked what i heard.
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

James Sweeney

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Honor: 0
    • jamessweeneyy
    • jamesweeneyoung
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2016, 06:39:04 pm »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2016, 07:38:06 pm »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

sounded the same or production costs.
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

James Sweeney

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Honor: 0
    • jamessweeneyy
    • jamesweeneyoung
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2016, 08:01:28 pm »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

sounded the same or production costs.

What?

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2016, 08:20:01 pm »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

sounded the same or production costs.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=production%20costs

wut?
What?

quote ception
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

FarleyCZ

  • Low Mid
  • **
  • Posts: 493
  • Honor: 93
    • farleycz
    • farleycz
    • View Profile
    • I tried to code a page, look!
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2016, 10:21:34 pm »
The difference is what is under the hood. Stock plugins usually do "just" the job they are made to do. That's perfectly OK in a lot of cases. Plugins like iZotope Ozone do a lot of clever stuff under the hood. Especially when speaking about it's limiter. Nobody except iZotope engineers knows exactly what happens there, but I've heard some rummors about several stages of compression with various strengths in cascade after each other. ...and so on.
"Earth is round right? Look at it from right angle and you'll be always on top of the world."
...but don't overdo it, because that's called being a d***k.

James Sweeney

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Honor: 0
    • jamessweeneyy
    • jamesweeneyoung
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2016, 09:42:13 am »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

sounded the same or production costs.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=production%20costs

wut?
What?

quote ception

i'm still not really sure what your getting at, lol

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2016, 04:07:34 pm »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

sounded the same or production costs.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=production%20costs

wut?
What?

quote ception

i'm still not really sure what your getting at, lol

you're talking about price and quality, when the price could just be a factor of production costs. IE, the cost that goes into making the product.

You'd want to think that the higher cost means quality, but that could just be a factor of the production side.
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

James Sweeney

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Honor: 0
    • jamessweeneyy
    • jamesweeneyoung
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2016, 04:28:37 pm »
There are differences otherwise we'd all just use the stock plugins of the daw we use.
Waves would never be able to sell their plugins for thousands if it all sounded the same!  ;D

sounded the same or production costs.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=production%20costs

wut?
What?

quote ception

i'm still not really sure what your getting at, lol

you're talking about price and quality, when the price could just be a factor of production costs. IE, the cost that goes into making the product.

You'd want to think that the higher cost means quality, but that could just be a factor of the production side.

ohhhhh, what i'm saying is that nobody would actually pay thousands for them if they were the same...
i'm not suggesting that price equals quality, just that there are obviously differences if people are paying a shit tonne of money for them

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2016, 05:27:26 pm »
ohhhhh, what i'm saying is that nobody would actually pay thousands for them if they were the same...
i'm not suggesting that price equals quality, just that there are obviously differences if people are paying a shit tonne of money for them

quote clean up...

glad we're on the same page.

yes but what would make the price point be considered that much money and why would people consider aiming to have those plug ins?
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

James Sweeney

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Honor: 0
    • jamessweeneyy
    • jamesweeneyoung
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2016, 08:22:31 pm »
ohhhhh, what i'm saying is that nobody would actually pay thousands for them if they were the same...
i'm not suggesting that price equals quality, just that there are obviously differences if people are paying a shit tonne of money for them

quote clean up...

glad we're on the same page.

yes but what would make the price point be considered that much money and why would people consider aiming to have those plug ins?

it varies from plug-in to plug-in, some colour the sound is as far as i can confidently go... someone else is better off explaining how they're different

Lydian

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Honor: 107
  • Hi! I'm Danny! Let's talk production! :)
    • View Profile
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2016, 07:12:40 am »
ohhhhh, what i'm saying is that nobody would actually pay thousands for them if they were the same...
i'm not suggesting that price equals quality, just that there are obviously differences if people are paying a shit tonne of money for them

quote clean up...

glad we're on the same page.

yes but what would make the price point be considered that much money and why would people consider aiming to have those plug ins?

who tf cares...  ::)
A young 14 year old me with a really bad haircut. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eMbftWV75w

Babasmas

  • Low Mid
  • **
  • Posts: 215
  • Honor: 32
  • I'm cool !
    • babasmasmoosic
    • babasmas
    • View Profile
    • wololoooo
Re: Izotope?
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2016, 11:28:20 am »
I've used Izotope and it's cool. Easy enough to use when you understand it and it's kinda what everyone uses.

But is it really necessary ? no, absolutely not. It obviously is a fancy software. It does the job well, i agree, but there's freeware doing the same thing.

I use Flux STTools for Stereo imaging, ModernExciter for Lows and High, Fruity Limiter for compression, Parametric EQ 2 for EQing (of course) and Maximus.
Flux STTools is Free, ModernExciter is Free. Fruity stocks are includes in FL Producer Edition. They do the job on the same level than Izotope.