Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Marrow Machines

Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 53
661
Inspiration/Creativity/Motivation / Re: Pointlessness and music
« on: February 07, 2016, 03:21:02 am »
I'm troubled with this topic after years of making music as well. There are several other things I could do at a professional level and they would turn out great. Or I could make yet another semi-ok song that nobody cares about.

I don't think there's anything wrong with considering a creative outlet one of your priorities. Sure, some people seem content to live as passive, unthinking drones, but self-expression and mastery of skills are legitimate needs, at least if you consider personal happiness to be important (which it absolutely is).

I like the idea of music as being an important creative outlet.  I'd like to tie my music into my current emotions and experiences, so that it serves as sort of a diary, but I can never figure out how established artists seem to do this.  For example, I live in the woods, and a fog rolls in. How do I translate that into a synth? Or finish a song before the fog is gone? Is that something artists even try to do?

I am most inspired by the music I like, or maybe one of my synths. How is it good artists seem to be inspired by unrelated material? Maybe my life is too easy and uneventful for this idea to work.

You can't be something your not.

There's nothing wrong with trying to do any of what you said, you just have to figure out a way to solve the problem you're having. And you do that by writing down what you want to write down.

The professional musicians might not have the luxury of doing what they want, even though they think they do. This is entailed by the music they make and what eventually happens to it. Unless they make some pretty personal stuff and give it away for free or sell it, they're still taking a risk.

On the other hand, if you're doing this more as a hobby or, as a few mentioned before, not doing this entirely. You're still creating the music as it brew inside of you. It's just  not manifested yet.

I come from a culture of many excellent musicians, and they all have day jobs. At least the ones from the 1950's and prior. And the ones who would do music as a work, were incredible.

Now, i am not saying that i don't have dreams of being a dubstep dude who gets paid well to create, but, after my experience going on tour and doing the whole travel thing, it doesn't seem like it would be very fun after a while. I'd have to be well taken care of and get paid enough from many angles, to sit in a studio to make music and then support said music.

At some point, what you create will have some purpose. Even if you're not spending as much time as you ought to, you're still doing music.

Sounds like this is may be an existential question projected at music.

No one blames you for doing the things you gotta do, and in time, those things might shift into a better schedule. Time helps in figuring things out for you.

662
Sound Design / Re: How did you learn sound design?
« on: February 07, 2016, 03:07:43 am »
Getting good speakers and headphones.

Once you get a handle on a good replication of what you're hearing, it makes a load of difference when trying to get the ideas into your daw.

I'll also suggest getting a computer that's optimized for audio work. Like the fastest CPU you can afford(intel, amd sucks;effecient hyper threading(i think)>MORE CORES LOL), 16gigs of ram for 64bit OS, and a decent graphics card (this will help with graphical processing and get rid of the burden on your CPU;nvidia)

I also suggest a desktop over a laptop. Mostly because if you're not a touring, it's just better to work with that due to it's power capabilities and expandability.

This probably doesn't touch on like "siqq wubs", but these things should be considered when your siqq wubs start stuttering and you have to deal with bad emotions that shouldn't be present. Just keeps you focused on your sound design.


Other than that, i just continued to do it. The youtube videos got me a basic understanding of the synths, but they didn't really teach me much because i already wanted to make things my own way.

I also read several books on the origins of synthesizers. I've also read more technical books about computer music, dry af and long but i got some bits out of it.

There's several reason, and several resources to draw on that encompasses "sound design".

663
Thanks for the advice, see I see people use KRK's a lot or some other monitors, I just don't know the logistics on monitors this is is really narrowing a lot of monitors down. anything i should listen to specifically when I buy monitors?
listen to EVERY THING.

You may think those genelecs shouldn't be heard by your ears, but listen to them. get an understanding of what out of your price range, or in, sounds like.

You won't fully understand the monitors until you break them in, and put them to use. It's one of those things where you have to understand the tool and adjust to it, You don't make it adjust to you.

You can always go ask your people that work at those shops their opinion, or the general sound is of the monitors. Have them test it out for you. If you're serious about buying it, they'll obliged to help you make the best decision possible. That is if they are not lazy.

You gotta experience this in real life man, you're questions are starting to go beyond the scope of what the internet can provide.

I do suggest, do a massive amount of research and testing and be aware of deals.

If you want some brutally honest speakers that will last you a lifetime in conjunction with any upgrades that you might buy over your career, then the yamahas hs8's are a good bet and well worth the investment

664
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Mixing at incredibly low levels
« on: February 07, 2016, 02:52:39 am »
I just set  my interface's volume knob at a volume that's slightly above activating both speakers.

If i really want to see how it sounds at even lower volume, i pop in dim mode on my interface's software (the thing that control my ASIO settings or w/e) and i just crank the volume to where it's loud to hear, but at a much lower volume than if i were to have dim mode off.

another practice is pick the most quietest time of day, and do some mixing then. Couple the quiet with the decreased volume, and it'll be a different perception entirely.

I also do this technique to ensure that i still achieve my peaks at 0db, but i can save my ears and make decisions the longer i get into it.

I've also started adopting a realization for taking breaks. I just can't do the same rigor that i could do when i first started. besides, it gets not fun at that point.

When I was doing some recordings with Gordon Raphael, he said that the mix should sound good at the quietest of levels. The quietest you can get. Might be an exaggeration, but i applied what he said, and it helped me understand how much of an impact it makes at louder levels.

665
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Ear Fatigue
« on: February 06, 2016, 08:11:39 pm »
Nothing new from what others have said.

But, maybe you're just to attached to the work that you're doing.

It might be beneficial to take a step back and just call it a day when you feel that you need to push yourself. Don't get me wrong, it's ok to do that every now and again, but you have to be smart about knowing when you can push yourself and when you just need to let it rest.

Quite the difficult balancing act to feel.

666
Learn how to finish a song. Learn how to develop a workflow. Learn how to be a songwriter before you learn how to be an engineer.
Huge and simple.

big up

667
You can take it as a teaching approach or you can just continue to be "dumb" about it.

If you like the guy and want to guide him, there's no hurting in being the teacher.

If he seeks your counsel that is, then you can gradually inform him of your experience as you grow together.

If the person is a douche, then let him douche until he figures it out for himself.

otherwise, i don't see why you shouldn't have a helping hand in guiding the person until they are able to walk on their own.

Plus it'll benefit you if you do some teaching.

then you can form your new romance and collaborate...lol

668
From my experience, which involved buying budget speakers only to replace them within that year, you will need better monitors.

I had some Alesis Elevate 5s cus they were cheap. Sounded great, or so I thought at the time. Since ive upgraded to JBL LSR305s, Im hearing things way better. The bass is way more accurate now. And I actually found my pair on Amazon for $200 new. That should fit into the budget you laid out.

Now depending on your setup and room, maybe the LSR308s are better since they would be 8" vs 5" woofer. I've also heard great things about yamaha. Never had them myself but lots of people love them.

What about the Rokits KRK RP5G3 Rokit 5 Generation Monitor - Pair? Which is is better or is there another brand that would be good if not better?

don't go cheap. krk's are glorified consumer speakers.

It is better than nothing, but once i've actually listened to them with learned ears, i quickly understood why my friend hates them with a passion.

I suggest you go listen at guitar center or where ever and any where that has these sort of products to get an idea of what tickles your ear.

Don't be afraid to save up for an extra couple months or so. This WILL be a big step in your career/hobby. don't try to cut corners with this purchase.

669
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Panning
« on: February 05, 2016, 11:09:29 pm »
If you're using a stereo track then in most DAWs the panner acts as a balance between left/right channels.  If you want to pan a track within a stereo field then use a mono track and pan accordingly.

You can also control the stereo width. Ill.Gates, suggested this in one tutorial, and it's come in handy many times.

670
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Eq'ing for better sound
« on: February 05, 2016, 11:07:50 pm »
your sentence structure is needing some punctuation, it's tough to sift through your post.

That aside,

look up frequency charts and the differences of subtractive and additive eq. Look up signal chains, and the importance of effects in the chain.

Understand how you can better utilize stereo effects, understand how you can best utilize dynamic effects/tools, understand how you can best utilize frequency control (this is what you seek from your post), understand how to best utilize instrument position and stereo width (mono/stereo, panning)



You need the mindset of "how can i best fit this instrument, with this frequency range, into my song?"

The key will also effect how your eq responds.

I also know that this chart is for acoustic instruments, but the range in which frequency and vibrations go, the timbre is the only thing that's different when it comes to synths/natural instruments. You can have a synth and an oboe occupy the same range. Reason being, some instruments work better in certain keys than others and are forced into spotlight at times.

There's probably nothing new to what you've been told, but the research you should seek and the questions you should ask need to be more pointed with understanding of yourself and your skill.

I'll always suggest this, find some one irl to help you. The forums can only do so much.
lastly, do your own research.

Combine all this information i've given you, and you should, hopefully, be ready to rock and roll and eventually learn for yourself and seek answers to the problems.

671
Keep your old speakers. I still use my Logitec speakers that have a sub for consumer and casual use.

If you've spent some time with those speakers they can be a good reference point for that particular play back across consumer grade speakers.

You should upgrade your monitors if you're ready and you have the funds to do so.

You will also need to figure in cables, interface(if you do not have one), and stands. The stands aren't required, but boy are they HIGHLY recommended on my part.

Since this is your first upgrade, i suggest you buy in the 300-350$ range per speaker. I've tested some things that are below that range, and they just fall short of the quality you get.

I will, go out on a limb and suggest you look into 8inch speakers, because it gives you a range of frequencies that are easily accessible with out much need for an upgrade for a very long time. The only thing that i could suggest is a change of environment, and more expensive gear (1500$ per speaker range or w/e).

But that's end game.

Hope these suggestions help, it's also better to be patient and go looking for odd sales. I got my yamaha hs8's for the same price as KRK's, and the quality in that price range for the product i bought blows every thing out of the water, to me.

672
Samples/Plugins/Software/Gear / Re: Is the newest software worth it?
« on: February 05, 2016, 07:57:35 pm »
I'd only upgrade my software if there's a must have feature, or to utilize more processing power.

Other wise it's kind of a wash. These programs are going to have a hard time building on them selves outside of running more efficiently.

That's with any technology though.

I'd say it's worth it to upgrade every now and again if you have the funds, but meh.

673
What you say is not incorrect, but i think it's out of place to suggest for a person who is just beginning their journey.

I still disagree with this and I don't think it's out of place at all, but it's just my opinion of course. The beginning should always start with the music itself, not the techniques behind it.

Right, but depending on the circumstances the person may just find themselves learning every thing at once. Unless they can focus on one thing, every thing is enticing.

Normally, it seems people learn by wanting to do the thing that piques their interest first. and it may not be hook theory or music, as you stated.


Quote
I know this is what i want to be doing with my life but some tips on what areas i should read into to gain a broad foundation would be great. Also how do you guys deal with dishearted thoughts towards music when its not sounding as good as you want it and you aren't necessarily seeing progress

That was the aim of the topic at hand. And like i said, what you suggest seems advanced to give to a mindset of some one who is probably just starting. BUT, as I've said before, it's still great advice!

The context isn't quite clear outside of the specified questions he asked and wanted answer towards.

That's my only defense towards your statement.

Less we loop ourselves in a never ending passive aggressive producer forum talk, I'll stop there.


BTW, OP you gain confidence with each experience. The learning curve at first is bad, but if you really have grit and stick it out, you'll be better than you were yesterday. You'll always want a deep and broad understanding of your art and profession in order to be versatile and wanted. I find it best to do your own research and find some one who is willing to guide you or befriend some one your age on a similar journey so that you can learn off each other, and grow.

There's a quote from skytree, he said that "even if you just open up you daw and don't do any thing, you've made progress."
wishful thinking, but some days, that's all you can do.

674
Mixing/Mastering / Re: Struggling with dB levels!
« on: February 05, 2016, 03:43:15 am »
I think what you're describing are peaks.

You'll have an accumulation of sound that will often times go beyond, or get very close to, 0db on the master fader.

As mention above, mixing is 90% volume adjustment on the individual channels (it's my go to before i do any,light, additive eq). I might add very clever in explanation.

If you keep the master fader at 0db, you can see when Your entire song, peaks or clips.

At that moment of clipping, you'll have to discern what is happening so that you can adjust. This skill takes some time to get but eh. If you've rendered it out from the master, you can look at the entire wave form and see what's happening. This also works if you bounce the master track and look at the entire wave form to adjust or make automations at the correct time location.

In all honesty, your average volume, might be where you need it to be in terms of mastering. This tends to happen frequently if you're aiming to not have any peaks at 0. I tend to run my mixes hotter where they do peak at 0, some times, but that's a recent trend of mine.

So it sounds like your mix might be to hot to begin with and lowering the master isn't helping, because that information is clipping already.

675
How can you write a song if you don't know how to use your DAW?

Ermmm... early classical music was written with a pen and a paper for crying out loud. people have been writing songs without DAWs long before DAWs ever existed. And most of them will FOREVER be on the radio. Can't really say the same for most music that is coming out of DAWs these days.... Also, some people are STILL writing music without DAWs.

Or know some theory, at least enough to get started?
That's why I mentioned Hook Theory. I would take music theory over mixing theory any day.

How can you start using your DAW if you don't know how the plugins work?
How can you know how the plugins work if you don't know what the functions they're performing accomplish? 
How can you learn about the various functions without knowing what's out there, and why you'd want to use them?

You learn all of these things after you have written a song... as you're making the track. You can sketch out a full song first and then worry about mixing and plugins afterwards.

The main takeaway though is *don't get discouraged*.
You only fully reach this state after learning to love the process.

You're not appreciating the steps it takes to learn how to walk and chew bubble gum.

I get where you're coming from, but with out proper training in regards to music, it's hard to even fathom what the sound is like in the mind. I'll also mention that with the variety of sounds a synthesizer can produce, you can't even BEGIN to consider what it would sound like or achieve what you want in your mind to start to write that down on paper man.

The OP's topic is about production, and that's what most of these answer are in regards to.

I get where you're coming from, but dsylecix and I are suggesting the emotional context that comes with learning the technical and creative side of production.
It's quite daunting as you know.

What you say is not incorrect, but i think it's out of place to suggest for a person who is just beginning their journey. Not every one has the grit to sort through all the things when considering how to make a track. I've gotten to that point where i can be efficient in my analysis and know what should be changed my mixing and mastering after 6 years of producing and an equipment upgrade...

That's miles ahead for a beginner.

Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 53