Author Topic: Bitwig  (Read 32146 times)

pranavvjnair

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Honor: 0
    • ultrajackmusic
    • UltraJackTweets
    • View Profile
    • UltraJack
Bitwig
« on: January 06, 2016, 06:54:30 pm »
Any bitwig studio user in here ??
What made u to move to this one ?? ;)

Nichols

  • Subsonic
  • Posts: 12
  • Honor: 2
  • My Name is Chris. I am ignorant to production.
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2016, 07:53:16 pm »
Probably best placed in sections that correlate with technology.
Beginner Producer. Music & Sound Recording Major

jaxter184

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Honor: 2
    • jaxter184
    • jaxter184
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2016, 08:48:37 pm »
I'm a huge fan of Bitwig. After demoing out FL, Ableton, and Reaper, Bitwig has been my favorite so far, and it's the only one that I've bought.

I suppose in terms of Composition/Arrangement/Theory some cool features are looking at multiple MIDI tracks in the MIDI editor, which is incredibly helpful when writing chords and melodies. Also, the controller API is customizable if you know Java, so using controllers is a lot easier with workflow and stuff. Like Ableton, there are a lot of MIDI effects, like arps and diatonic note transposers. In terms of arrangement, it's a little lacking because it doesn't have time signature sectioning flags like Ableton does (I don't recall if FL does), but everything else is pretty cool. I would take a look at their demo and see if it's easier for you to compose. For me, it definitely was.

ocularedm

  • Guest
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2016, 08:50:30 pm »
This post would likely be better suited to the Samples/Plugins/Gear section of the forum. Cheers :D

VOIID

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 91
  • Honor: 29
    • voiidmusic
    • IamVOIID
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2016, 09:34:27 pm »
I'm using Bitwig and I love it, I just think its default plugins are worse than FL's or Ableton's, which are the other 2 DAWs I've tried.

ZAU

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Honor: 44
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2016, 11:49:39 pm »
Bitwig user here! Jumped from Logic and I don't see myself looking back.

Making music on Logic just didn't seem that fun for me anymore. Logic is modern but archaic at the same time. The Environment is not intuitive at all.. Bitwig makes it so easy to do route things the way you want to. Bitwig is so intuitive and flexible.

Snowpoke

  • Subsonic
  • Posts: 9
  • Honor: 0
    • https://soundcloud.com/snowpoke
    • https://twitter.com/snowpoked
    • View Profile
    • Snowpoke on Instagram
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2016, 06:43:10 pm »
The first DAW I have really stuck to. Tried Fruity Loops back in the day as a child, Logic and had some fun with Ableton before stumbling upon Bitwig Studio around March/april 2014. Went a little back and forth between it and Ableton for a couple of months before sticking to Bitwig.

Brian Bollman's Bitwig Studio & Music Production Course has been of immensive help, and still is. https://youtu.be/ZXE8Br_xn-g?list=PLppiTGoCM2hK-iqNRJzdCdOaRHYWDncW8

This post would likely be better suited to the Samples/Plugins/Gear section of the forum. Cheers :D
Second this.

deathy

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 53
  • Honor: 7
    • deathy-1
    • View Profile
    • deathy's FB page
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2016, 06:47:06 pm »
I have a vested interest in liking Bitwig, 'cause I'd really prefer to move completely to an open source OS, but it's just not quite ready to replace Ableton.  It's so close I can almost taste it, and I can't wait for that day to arrive.

I must say, though, that I am shocked to see a DAW written in Java.  That is some crazy tight coding to pull that off.
If the truth can be... told...
so as to be... underSTOOOD...
it will be... belIEVed.

- Terrence McKenna

Snow

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Honor: 10
    • mindlessnl
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2016, 07:40:37 pm »
I just installed it and I shall see what it will bring. Heard some great stories and I love how you can hide the automation which is the factor I want to switch from fruityloops

bryan

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 142
  • Honor: 28
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2016, 08:11:24 pm »
My 2 cents on bitwig.  They recently released v1.2 and v1.3.  Some of the features of these releases are: ability to group tracks, visual display of dynamics in fx, and project templates.

These are all things that have been available in ableton for a while.. 

I'm an ableton user. I love the look and idea of bitwig, but as deathy said, it's just not ready to replace ableton yet.

FarleyCZ

  • Low Mid
  • **
  • Posts: 493
  • Honor: 93
    • farleycz
    • farleycz
    • View Profile
    • I tried to code a page, look!
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2016, 01:01:08 pm »
I'm an ableton user. I love the look and idea of bitwig, but as deathy said, it's just not ready to replace ableton yet.
Same here.
"Earth is round right? Look at it from right angle and you'll be always on top of the world."
...but don't overdo it, because that's called being a d***k.

shagia

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Honor: 2
  • //if you could just see
    • deadformant
    • sshagia
    • View Profile
    • home
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2016, 04:30:19 pm »
FL user turned Bitwig user here, I've had nothing but a great time with Bitwig, although Bitwig has it's own issues, and one of them pointed out in this thread is just that it's not 'ready' to replace a lot if 'replacing' were a selling point. There's things missing with default plugins (a strong point: a vocoder), there's a lack of Rewire support if you roll that way (JACK seems to be able to do something like Rewire, but I haven't looked into it, until then here's this), and a kind of useful yet disappointing set of default sounds.

As for the positives and what made me move, PDC, plugin sandboxing (FL has plugin sandboxing I think, but it just didn't seem to work for me majority of the time? There'd be points where FL would have a plugin crash and it'd tell me that a plugin crashed, but majority of the time, if a plugin crashes, it all crashes..), the ability to have multiple projects 'open' (I say 'open' because you can only have the audio engine on for one which makes sense), the audio engine startup process generally just being faster than loading up a project in FL, audio events and how incredibly easy and fast it is to play with them compared to FL, and it's composition view being so flexible. I haven't bothered looking at Open Controller API yet. There's more coming along the way for Bitwig like Network Syncing and Modular Device Programming too, so I feel Bitwig will have a strong future ahead of itself.

I still like to use FL on the side though, FL is still always useful, including for it's piano roll, which is forever.

ZAU

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Honor: 44
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2016, 11:35:37 pm »
I still like to use FL on the side though, FL is still always useful, including for it's piano roll, which is forever.

Great point, I think FL's Piano Roll has some really nice features though I don't really need them all. I would be happy if Bitwig got a Line tool and that's it.

pranavvjnair

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Honor: 0
    • ultrajackmusic
    • UltraJackTweets
    • View Profile
    • UltraJack
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2016, 07:34:38 pm »
Bitwig 2.0 would change the DAW market... Mark my words ;)

Devout

  • Subsonic
  • Posts: 17
  • Honor: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Bitwig
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2016, 07:39:07 pm »
Was an Ableton user for years. Eventually was really put off by Ableton's PDC.
Switched to Bitwig recently. Really happy with it. I feel it's simpler, more intuitive, and better looking than Ableton. Plus it's PDC actually works. Never going back.