Author Topic: Having trouble with theory (again) - specifically scales over chord progressions  (Read 16074 times)

R3Mington

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • Honor: 0
  • wtf is music theory?
    • View Profile
Title.

I guess I'm trying to read this stuff and understand it. (i have a bachelors so its not that i cant read, hahah). I guess this may be a dumb question since i dont even understand how i should phrase it.

Im playing a song and i have my chord progression. Solid. I can understand what chord progression it is by roman numerals. Check. Its all perfect (in theory), and it checks out.

Heres the part im having trouble understanding.

How do i recognize the scale over the chord progression/and or what that scale should be?

When i am creating music- melody, specifically- is that just a scale of certain notes over chord progression?

Hopefully this is clear. thanks for the help. I am not a music major, but i do enjoy this stuff.

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
If you're in a major key, use a major scale.

If you're in a minor key, use a minor scale.

The type of scales and type of chord progressions have a relationship that are associated with their corresponding root note.

Basically pick the scale in the key you're in and start hammering out some notes.

It'll sound awkward at first, but eventually you'll get better at deciding what to play with the type of chord progression.


Also, if you're usuing a MIDI keyboard and don't know proper piano fingering, i suggest you take some time to learn it. It'll make more sense when using the keyboard.

You can get away from the proper fingering, once you get use to the technical way of playing.

One other piece of advice is, start with simple melodies that you can add onto, and then eventually get to the point where you can just jam out over 8, 16, 32 bars.

But that advice comes with the technical understanding of playing on the piano.

If you're doing something other than playing, i don't really have any advice for you except to just go and do trial and error.

edit:i get most of my melodies by literally jamming for like twenty mins or so (some times longer or shorter) and record some things. The recording helps me see what i do and don't like about the idea i've written. and, some things stay some things go. You really have to see how the song wants to develop as, rather than what you want to do in most cases. Still decide about what you want, but understand where the song and your style is taking you.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2016, 03:02:47 am by Marrow Machines »
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

R3Mington

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • Honor: 0
  • wtf is music theory?
    • View Profile
i understand that but i guess i dont know how to apply a melody over a chord progression.

is the melody basically a scale jumping from mode to mode or scale to scale over a chord progression?

is there any rules to it besides having to follow the scale order?

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
i understand that but i guess i dont know how to apply a melody over a chord progression.

is the melody basically a scale jumping from mode to mode or scale to scale over a chord progression?

is there any rules to it besides having to follow the scale order?

It's what ever you want it to be. But that phrase comes with enough understanding of the basic aspects that make up a chord, scale, and the movement associated with them to eventually create the music you want from your mind or body.

To me, you can only change positions of the starting point in the scale.

If you were to change the scale entirely, your progression and "bucket of notes" have to change to match that corresponding idea. At that point, you're changing keys or root note. This is popular for certain forms of music and not really used in electronic music(from what i've heard).

You are really limited to the scale of the key you're in. But that offers many different ways to play the same thing, and that will often dictate the overall feel of the music.

There's no wrong way or right way to play over a chord progression, you just have to figure out what is good for you and use what you've written...

AS FAR as having the rules, the only rules are that you use the notes in the scale and play w/e the hell you want given the scale of the key that you're in.


You are bound by consonance of the progression how ever, and that's subjective to the artist (that's where you develop your skill as a creator).

scales and chords are equal and if you change something in one, you have to change the other to compensate. But the change can be drastic or slight, but definitely knowing the scale you're using will help shape the chords you use, or help shape the notes you use in the melody. It's a back and forth sort of thing.

It's a circular logic that feeds into itself, and if you're looking for a liner approach to this infinite loop, you need to stare and consider the keyboard in a more critical way. That's about as linear, and the limits, of any physical instrument as you can get.
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

Mussar

  • Administrator
  • Mid
  • *****
  • Posts: 631
  • Honor: 252
    • mussarmusic
    • mussarmusic
    • View Profile
    • My Site
I suggest enrolling in a structured music theory course, either online or in person. Getting jumbled bits and pieces of information assembled over various internet forums can get you pretty far, but wouldn't you rather just know it?

EDIT: Just to clarify, music theory is a really broad and oftentimes subjective area - there are dozens of rules for things that you are NEVER supposed to do right up until those times when you're supposed to do them. There are things that make sense only when you've learned other concepts, and it's a big mess of stuff priests tried to figure out when conducting choirs a couple hundred years ago. You don't need to rediscover all that stuff when there are people waiting to teach it to you!
« Last Edit: April 17, 2016, 04:46:25 am by Mussar »

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
I suggest enrolling in a structured music theory course, either online or in person. Getting jumbled bits and pieces of information assembled over various internet forums can get you pretty far, but wouldn't you rather just know it?

EDIT: Just to clarify, music theory is a really broad and oftentimes subjective area - there are dozens of rules for things that you are NEVER supposed to do right up until those times when you're supposed to do them. There are things that make sense only when you've learned other concepts, and it's a big mess of stuff priests tried to figure out when conducting choirs a couple hundred years ago. You don't need to rediscover all that stuff when there are people waiting to teach it to you!

I agree to this.

If it wasn't for two years of music theory in high school, i probably wouldn't understand music as much as i do.

Plus the teachers have better words, and better methods to help you reach the understanding level that you desire.

Hopefully i was of help to OP. At some point, you're gonna have to get a specialist to help you out.
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

R3Mington

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • Honor: 0
  • wtf is music theory?
    • View Profile
thanks i appreciate it, i think i may do that this upcoming semester.

no offense to you guys but you just arent hitting the mark for what im asking- that being said, i could be asking the wrong thing.

if any of you are up to skype sometime, id be willing to pay for an hour or so of music theory, related to specifically what i was asking.

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
thanks i appreciate it, i think i may do that this upcoming semester.

no offense to you guys but you just arent hitting the mark for what im asking- that being said, i could be asking the wrong thing.

if any of you are up to skype sometime, id be willing to pay for an hour or so of music theory, related to specifically what i was asking.

I gave you the working man's definition of your answer lol. Gotta go else where if you want the academic.

If you send me a PM maybe we can hammer out some details and set up a sype session if you're interested.

and can better tailor a response to your understanding type.

Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

Lydian

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Honor: 107
  • Hi! I'm Danny! Let's talk production! :)
    • View Profile
Quote
How do i recognize the scale over the chord progression/and or what that scale should be?

Listen to the HOME of the chord progression. If the chord progression keeps on revolving around the iii chord then you would use phyrgian. If the chord progression keeps on revolving around the IV chord then you would use Lydian.

Quote
When i am creating music- melody, specifically- is that just a scale of certain notes over chord progression?

Yes. A melody can be based off of a scale.
A young 14 year old me with a really bad haircut. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eMbftWV75w

Mussar

  • Administrator
  • Mid
  • *****
  • Posts: 631
  • Honor: 252
    • mussarmusic
    • mussarmusic
    • View Profile
    • My Site
thanks i appreciate it, i think i may do that this upcoming semester.

I think it's best to go with someone who's been certified (no offense intended to Marrow, I'm sure they're a great teacher) - an instructor at school will not only be able to give you a good guideline to follow when learning, you are paying for access to their office hours where you can just walk in and go "Hey, I got a question."

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
thanks i appreciate it, i think i may do that this upcoming semester.

I think it's best to go with someone who's been certified (no offense intended to Marrow, I'm sure they're a great teacher) - an instructor at school will not only be able to give you a good guideline to follow when learning, you are paying for access to their office hours where you can just walk in and go "Hey, I got a question."

None taken, i would point them in that direction as much after they've picked my brain for what it's worth. Up to the individual.

Definitely worth the experience IMO. I'd like to take a college level music theory class, but my calculus isn't gonna do itself -_-
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

R3Mington

  • Sub Bass
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • Honor: 0
  • wtf is music theory?
    • View Profile
There's something fundamentally that I'm missing, and I'm sure it's quite a simple answer. I've been reading a lot of music theory from certified books (certified as I've been asking and people have been providing text book names that I've personally purchased), and I know I'm just missing one thing to bring it all together. I'm not quite sure how to ask it yet - but if I were to phrase it.

How do you decide what the melody is over chord progression?
(i recognize that it's the chord progression that decides the sound by designating what it is through the tonal / home chord, but you guys are starting to confuse me slightly by having the melody be somewhat synonymous with it being basically a scale played on top- in reference to modes, why would the scale be allowed to be played out of order to make it a melody? i.e modes are the scale moved over one, etc down to the 7th factor.)

hope this makes sense and if anyone has enough time to answer this b.s. i'd appreciate it :]

Lydian

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Honor: 107
  • Hi! I'm Danny! Let's talk production! :)
    • View Profile
Quote
How do you decide what the melody is over chord progression?

You CAN have a melody that follows a chord progression if it's a melodic sequence. Examples of what that sounds like can be found at 3:01 of this song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbZSaoW788w and 0:26 of this song. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9TutX3iwSE

Also, every chord progression contains chord tones. If you have a C maj chord playing then the chord tones are C E G. The melody can be any one of these notes and it will sound good. Keep in mind that that there is nothing stopping you from playing notes that are outside of the chord like a ninth (D) or a fourth (F).
A young 14 year old me with a really bad haircut. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eMbftWV75w

Marrow Machines

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 788
  • Honor: 101
  • Electronic Music
    • marrow-machines
    • MarrowMachines
    • View Profile
There's something fundamentally that I'm missing, and I'm sure it's quite a simple answer. I've been reading a lot of music theory from certified books (certified as I've been asking and people have been providing text book names that I've personally purchased), and I know I'm just missing one thing to bring it all together. I'm not quite sure how to ask it yet - but if I were to phrase it.

How do you decide what the melody is over chord progression?
(i recognize that it's the chord progression that decides the sound by designating what it is through the tonal / home chord, but you guys are starting to confuse me slightly by having the melody be somewhat synonymous with it being basically a scale played on top- in reference to modes, why would the scale be allowed to be played out of order to make it a melody? i.e modes are the scale moved over one, etc down to the 7th factor.)

hope this makes sense and if anyone has enough time to answer this b.s. i'd appreciate it :]

Because you're making music.....

Scales and chords hold relationships to one another, and like relationships, you can go back and forth between what you know. If you want to form new relationships, you have to form a basis for it, or a reference point.

It's not that it's playing it in order or out of order, it's playing the consonance or the perception of consonance from the perspective of the artist and the context behind the notes that are played.

So, you're looking for concrete rules that you can apply. You can't, because when it comes to creating, you can do what ever you want when you know how the structure of your reference point is created.

It's like designing a house. Music theory is the invisible forces that the engineer needs to take into account when designing that house. The engineer then begins to adjust the designs when the house is actually being built.

Now here are the underlining parts, to be an engineer means you gain the understand to be called that. That's similar to understanding music theory. Adjusting the house is similar to choosing what scale and chord progression to use, as well as what notes to use.
 
And all the other stuff not included in creating...

This is a barrier for you, and I sense that. Once you break this whole rule mentality, then you will be able to see the truth behind the ability to create what ever you want to create, given the limitations of what you know with music theory.

Those books don't help you apply your craft, they get you on the way to use what has been collected over hundreds of years, so that you can apply it in your current world.

After all is said and done, it becomes more of an introspection question, and that is what I offer more so than the technical side of things.

Edit:written on my phone, I'll edit when I get to my house
« Last Edit: April 18, 2016, 01:32:00 am by Marrow Machines »
Josh Huval: Honestly, the guys who are making good art are spending their time making it.

Lydian

  • Mid
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Honor: 107
  • Hi! I'm Danny! Let's talk production! :)
    • View Profile
There's something fundamentally that I'm missing, and I'm sure it's quite a simple answer. I've been reading a lot of music theory from certified books (certified as I've been asking and people have been providing text book names that I've personally purchased), and I know I'm just missing one thing to bring it all together. I'm not quite sure how to ask it yet - but if I were to phrase it.

How do you decide what the melody is over chord progression?
(i recognize that it's the chord progression that decides the sound by designating what it is through the tonal / home chord, but you guys are starting to confuse me slightly by having the melody be somewhat synonymous with it being basically a scale played on top- in reference to modes, why would the scale be allowed to be played out of order to make it a melody? i.e modes are the scale moved over one, etc down to the 7th factor.)

hope this makes sense and if anyone has enough time to answer this b.s. i'd appreciate it :]

Because you're making music.....

Scales and chords hold relationships to one another, and like relationships, you can go back and forth between what you know. If you want to form new relationships, you have to form a basis for it, or a reference point.

It's not that it's playing it in order or out of order, it's playing the consonance or the perception of consonance from the perspective of the artist and the context behind the notes that are played.

So, you're looking for concrete rules that you can apply. You can't, because when it comes to creating, you can do what ever you want when you know how the structure of your reference point is created.

It's like designing a house. Music theory is the invisible forces that the engineer needs to take into account when designing that house. The engineer then begins to adjust the designs when the house is actually being built.

Now here are the underlining parts, to be an engineer means you gain the understand to be called that. That's similar to understanding music theory. Adjusting the house is similar to choosing what scale and chord progression to use, as well as what notes to use.
 
And all the other stuff not included in creating...

This is a barrier for you, and I sense that. Once you break this whole rule mentality, then you will be able to see the truth behind the ability to create what ever you want to create, given the limitations of what you know with music theory.

Those books don't help you apply your craft, they get you on the way to use what has been collected over hundreds of years, so that you can apply it in your current world.

After all is said and done, it becomes more of an introspection question, and that is what I offer more so than the technical side of things.

Edit:written on my phone, I'll edit when I get to my house

In Summary: Less science more tits.  :)
A young 14 year old me with a really bad haircut. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eMbftWV75w