Author Topic: 96000 Hz necessary?  (Read 5134 times)

yOboi

  • Subsonic
  • Posts: 6
  • Honor: 0
    • https://soundcloud.com/assajimusic
    • https://twitter.com/ASSAJImusic
    • View Profile
    • FB Page
96000 Hz necessary?
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:54:11 am »
Hey everyone!

I'm producing music on a Windows 7 / 64 bit system with Cubase 8.5. I'm using a Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 together with Genelec 8040's and I was wondering.. is it necesarry to produce on 96000 hz for the best quality? I feel like my sounddevice is causing some clicks when I produce on 96000 hz. And I had alot of issues with my sounddevices so I wanna do everything to prevent that.

I own Genelec 8040s, i spend alot of money on that.. Am I "wasting" the value of my precious monitors because I don't produce on 96000? and instead on 44? Or isn't that a big deal at all? I really wanna know. I wanna get the best quality out of my system.

Also.. Is it normal that my "High performance mode" in windows 7 actually causes more lagging and clicks than the normal performance mode which is recommered by Windows itself? I contacted Focusrite because I had issues with my device and they told me to change my computer settings to High performance mode... but I think it's better without that.

I just want a good workflow without issues with my sounddevice.

Thanks ALOT in advance.

FarleyCZ

  • Low Mid
  • **
  • Posts: 493
  • Honor: 93
    • farleycz
    • farleycz
    • View Profile
    • I tried to code a page, look!
Re: 96000 Hz necessary?
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2016, 06:23:21 pm »
Yes and no. If you have same source and sample it to 48kHz and 96kHz, you won't hear any difference. Your dog would, as they hear much higher, but you won't. It's physics and biology. So no need to waste resources on that if on budget.

Problem is with the source. DSP filters and distortions tend to introduce "false signal elements" called aliasing that are not supposed to be there. Good plugins oversample the signal (= raise it to 96k or 192k or higher) internally, so the DSP parts prone to aliasing will generate it way higher then is your audible range, thus you don't hear it. (...and then they downsample it back.) Theoretically if you use lot of oversampled plugins, all that resampling may actually eat more resources than just switching the daw to 96k. ...but from your description, that is not the case.

I personally switched to 96k, so I don't have to solve plugin oversampling too much. It's essentially 2x oversampling the whole DAW. But be careful if you want to do this. Suprprisingly A LOT of plugins don't like sample rate changes. They either crash, or they have badly written DSP that relies on samplerate too much and they change sound when you switch. So if you're not sure that your computer can handle it, stay at 48k. Honest advice. It will save you trouble.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 06:26:44 pm by FarleyCZ »
"Earth is round right? Look at it from right angle and you'll be always on top of the world."
...but don't overdo it, because that's called being a d***k.

yOboi

  • Subsonic
  • Posts: 6
  • Honor: 0
    • https://soundcloud.com/assajimusic
    • https://twitter.com/ASSAJImusic
    • View Profile
    • FB Page
Re: 96000 Hz necessary?
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2016, 08:01:09 pm »
Thank you so much :) I think the best option is 48 in my case.