We've already established that there are more people posting music than feedback.
Have we, though? You've
said it, but that's not the same thing.

- Is it really a problem if tracks have just one or two people's feedback? Why?
- Is it really a problem if someone with a low post count receives feedback on a track? Why? Why do you consider some people's tracks "spam"? What do you think they want out of the experience? Is it any different from what someone with a three-digit post count wants? Why do you think it's unfair that they receive feedback? Feedback is something for the person who leaves it to
give, not something to which you're entitled (or not entitled!)
- If you enforce an amount of feedback given, you encourage the sort of useless alibi feedback posts you ostensibly decry (and you will discourage people from giving any feedback at all if you try to enforce quality standards for it, yes, even those whose feedback would meet them.) I believe your scheme would overall
decrease the amount and quality of feedback given, except maybe from a handful of people—and by your rules only they would be allowed to ask for more feedback, so you'd be effectively closing off the section for most everyone else.
- The people who struggle to give meaningful feedback are the ones who need good feedback the most. You say that emotional feedback is "probably just as important as any technical feedback", well there you went and made your own feedback quality rules redundant, because "sick drop bro" is some valid-ass emotional feedback, even if you may prefer it in more flowery language. Also love the threatening note on which you end the quote: "As long as you're sincere and openly show that you're trying to give quality feedback, I don't think there should be a problem." What happens if there is a problem? Who determines that? You sure left the door open to make it a problem if you wanted to!
- That stasi shit about reporting people for infractions is hella creepy. What is this, some kind of police state? Relax! Maybe if a track didn't get a lot of feedback, that's feedback in itself.
You're trying to turn this into a job, and feedback into a kind of currency, when it's really something that can only be freely given.
Final note:
Provide an alternative and explain why it's better. You're not contributing by just saying "oh that wouldn't work" and leaving it at that.
That is a) wrong, b) an unreasonable demand to make, and c) certainly not yours to demand in the first place. People do contribute by pointing out faulty reasoning, even when they don't come up with a complete alternative plan. You're not the King of Posting Who Makes the Rules Around Here, and nobody is under compulsion to jump through the hoops you hold up.