Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AnnieTP

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
46
The future genre seems to have made a big leap since 2014. Then there's these two newer terms "chill trap" and "heaven trap" (that second one is even more recent), which I don't understand why they can't just be classified as future bass.

The things people come up with...

-Annie

47
WIPs / Re: my first remix w.i.p
« on: April 23, 2016, 11:13:45 am »
Well, for your first remix, it's not bad. The two main issues right now are your mix and your transitions. Without getting into specifics, your mix could use a little fixing, but I'll let it go since this is still a WIP, and you may or may not have done any mixing up to this point.
Your transitions could be smoother. The dubstep parts and the chillout parts are very different, and you're trying to glue them together with sweeps, or nothing. They almost feel like separate entities.
Also, I am not entirely sure about your ending. You will change that, right?

-Annie

48
Finished Tracks / AnnieTP - Experiment_5 (Looking for criticism)
« on: April 22, 2016, 10:36:13 pm »
Hi.

I'm looking for a few opinions on this song I just finished. Tell me anything you don't like about the song, and how I could fix it.

It's a minimal(ish?) song. I'm not entirely sure how the highs turned out.

Anyways, thanks for the feedback.

-Annie



49
Looking back at when I first got FL, I think I should have watched some more tutorials so I knew (or, at least, had an idea of) what to do. I didn't have any starting plan, so it took me a while to actually get momentum going. I wanted just to mess around in FL, which I did learn from, but not as much as I could have by watching at least a couple tutorials.

-Annie

50
Finished Tracks / Re: Two Suns - Beatbox Rhythm (Dubstep/Soul Funk)
« on: April 21, 2016, 08:27:26 pm »
For your first song, this is really good. I like how you blended two genres as smoothly as you did. I have a few remarks though:
- Do you have a sub bass going? I feel like there's something missing in the bass range when the dubstep basses aren't blasting.
- And they are blasting. I would turn down your dubstep basses just a little.
- At 2:58, the hats playing are too loud.

So good job overall. Make sure you practice your composing and arrangement, and the rest will follow.

-Annie

51
Finished Tracks / Re: Johan Brodd - Lush dream
« on: April 21, 2016, 05:30:39 pm »
I think you did very well on this. I congratulate you.

I would usually say what I didn't like about the song, but here I can't find much. Everything seems to fit into its place just right. I'll just say two things though. These are not big problems, just things that jumped out at me.

- This is, actually, hardly an issue at all. But, let me just say that the tropical lead in the intro has somewhat too much reverb. Since there are not many elements going in the mids in the intro, it doesn't hinder the mix, but if there were enough it would have contributed to a sort of "muddiness".
- The "finger snap" (if that's what you want to call it) seems a little too loud. Just a tiny bit...

Overall, very good. Maybe someone more experienced than me will find a flaw that I missed.

-Annie

52
WIPs / Re: Silly Progressive House
« on: April 21, 2016, 11:53:37 am »
You need to watch your use of repetition. What I could suggest is: for the introductory arp, try "evolving" it with some kind of automation. For the second half of the song, this is really where it started to become monotonous. You could do the same thing as in the intro, or use a similar, but different lead along with the current one, or make the melody less repetitive. Or all three. I don't know how long you intend to make the song, so really it's your call.
Also, I agree, that sweep needs to change. The transition there also could be a bit more pronounced. I feel like there's no contrast between those two areas.

-Annie

53
WIPs / Re: First half of possible song
« on: April 21, 2016, 11:46:42 am »
Well, it's kind of unfortunate you haven't gotten any feedback here yet. Really, the sound of the song itself is already good. Assuming you can mix well, I don't think you'll have any trouble there.
As for the arrangement, there's plenty of things you can do. You could get into an four-on-the-floor switchup for the second drop. Or you could go for something more chilly. I have seen, on occasion, a future bass tune turn into a melodic DnB song on the next drop. You could turn it in into something "harder", closer to trap. You could omit all other drops entirely. Just remember that it's YOUR song. You can make it as long, short, or as futuristic as you want.

-Annie

54
WIPs / Re: "Your Hands" any kind feedback is welcome
« on: April 19, 2016, 01:42:26 pm »
It's an extended mix? Oh, interesting.

Cons:

- The vocal chops get somewhat annoying after a while. Either try more variation, or remove some bits.
- I was expecting a drop after the buildup at 1:19. All right, I can wait.
- The drop (when it finally comes) is a little weak. After that prolonged buildup, the drop that followed was a bit of a let down. Thankfully it wasn't bad.

Pros:

- You have a smooth chord progression in the song.
- Also there is smooth arrangement.

Good job on it overall so far.

Lastly: I'm not a very experienced musician, so if anyone else gives you feedback on this song that contradicts what I've said here, it's very likely that they're right and I'm not.

-Annie

55
WIPs / Re: Futurechill/Rnb/Hiphop/Vibes.
« on: April 19, 2016, 12:32:46 pm »
Nice cover art.

Cons:

- The sweep at 0:12 does not fit in volume-wise and does not smoothly connect the first part of the intro with the second.
- The buildup claps that come in at 0:20 overpower the other elements.
- Your melody is good, but too repetitive. I only hear those three (three? four?) notes coming out of the melody.

Pros:

- I like the blend of ambient and sharp elements that you created. You have a good mood going in the song.
- Good use of contrast between the breaks and the drops.

Overall, good song. I know most of the problems were about the mix. However, even if you haven't started mixing yet, those are some thoughts for you to keep in mind going into the mixing phase when it comes.

Lastly: I'm not a very experienced musician, so if anyone else gives you feedback on this song that contradicts what I've said here, it's very likely that they're right and I'm not.
Good luck finishing. Hopefully you get a second opinion on this.

-Annie

56
WIPs / Re: House WIP - Unfinished
« on: April 17, 2016, 11:08:00 pm »
Hopefully you can get another opinion on this. It has plenty of potential!

Cons:

- It's kind of early in the process to find any problems. Since the clip is so short, all I can say is good job so far. I could see it turning into a powerful drop/climax, or whatever suits you.

Pros:

- For not being mastered (mixed?) it sounds really good! Mixing shouldn't be much of a problem.
- Good use of variety and repetition in your melodies.
- You have a really good, calm atmosphere going in your song, especially the intro.

-Annie

57
WIPs / Re: Airpotato (House)
« on: April 17, 2016, 10:39:55 pm »
I like my potatoes mashed hoohoo
Well, you didn't ask for any feedback in particular, so here goes?

Cons:

- I think the lead that comes in at 2:30 could use a bit more presence in the bass area. It would be alright if you left it, I suppose, but as is I think it lacks power.
- The kick also is lacking a little in in the lows, but it could be because the bass and leads are somewhat overwhelming to it.
- Do you have any sub bass in the song at all? I feel like the song in general is missing a sub, but it could be just me. However, the drop is in need of some added power in the sub area, I think, more than the rest of the song.
- Consider an ending? It doesn't have to be long, but the end was somewhat abrupt.

Pros:

- Good job keeping the long intro interesting.
- The breakdown after the drop was also well made, especially the transition from the break into the drop.

Overall, good job on the song so far! At first I was expecting a long, steady, uninterrupted minimal kind of house, but I was pleasantly surprised. Nice work.

One last thing: I'm not a very experienced musician, so if anyone else gives you feedback on this song that contradicts what I've said here, it's very likely that they're right and I'm not.

-Annie

58
WIPs / Re: Riddim thingy Drop Idea (Doctor P Remix)
« on: April 17, 2016, 09:09:38 pm »
I'll try.

Cons:

- First off, this is probably the biggest issue with it: Right away, the bass-synth thing that plays through most of the song is TOO LOUD. It drowns out everything else in the song whenever it plays, and that is not a good sign. I could hardly hear the kick and barely hear the snare because the bass was too loud. Every other element in the song is quiet compared to it, so it almost feels like it's just a heap of gritty stuff charging at me from out of the speakers. And since there is not much sound design in the way of basses, it quickly became monotonous, and it would have been even more so if it weren't so loud. Turn down the bass!
- Either turn down the bass or turn up everything else in the intro. What happened to me is I turned up the volume because I thought it wasn't loud enough and then--this huge load of noise comes crashing down on me. The contrast is way too much here that's it's not enjoyable.
- I can't really say anything else because that bass was so loud that I couldn't really analyze much.

Pros:

- It's heavy enough that you could excuse away most of the issues as "It's riddim though." Not that I have anything against riddim. =3
- No big issues with composing since riddim is not arrangment-heavy. I'll probably get burned for that, but from the riddim music I've heard, that's what I've taken away from it (or maybe I'm just taking it at face value too much.)

My feedback may not be very accurate because of my inexperience, so maybe try getting a second opinion from someone who is more experienced. By the way, is this actually a remix? Which song?

-Annie


Wait, is this an April Fool's joke? Now I feel stupid. Well, happy late April Fool's. I'm going to go look for a paper bag.

59
Thanks, everyone, for the advice. I really appreciate it. I also have some terms to look up now.

-Annie

60
WIPs / Re: Progressive WIP
« on: April 17, 2016, 07:26:03 pm »
I have some thoughts. Not much though, it's sounding pretty good as is.

Cons:

- I don't know if you have worked on any mixing yet, but here's some thoughts for you going into the mixing phase:
-- The high end does not sound so clean. Particularly the white noise. If you have done any sidechaining, that could be the problem.
-- Generally, try making the sounds a bit more clean. The sounds are little "low" quality sounding, if that makes it clear at all.

Pros:

- I don't have any problems with your melody. It's solid.
- Also, your arrangment is really good too. Just don't forget to add an ending.

Good stuff. Just get yourself an outro, work on the mixing, and you're set. Also, I noticed that your WIP is on SoundCloud. That's fine, but since you don't have a Pro account, I would recommend posting your WIP to a music uploading site, to save uploading time on your SoundCloud. Here are some examples:
https://instaud.io/, https://clyp.it/, or http://picosong.com/. Anyway, just a suggestion.

Lastly: I say this to everyone who I give feedback to -- I'm not a very experienced musician, so if anyone else gives you feedback on this song that contradicts what I've said here, it's very likely that they're right and I'm not.
Looking forward to the finished product.

-Annie

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5