Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Khron1k

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hey all, noticed something a bit odd today when I was applying a high pass filter sweep over a snare drum. I have my snare drum sitting at -10 db, but as I begin to cut low frequencies I end up actually losing headroom, and it ends up sitting at about -3.61 db(well by it, I mean the drum rack that the snare and filter are sitting in). I am quite confused how I appear to be losing headroom, even though I am removing frequency content.

Attached two relevant photos. For reference, my snare is the second element in the drum rack, and the eq is on the drum rack as opposed to on the snare.

1st screenshot is of the filter disabled and the rack metering at -10.10 db(side question, anybody have any idea why this is metering lower than the snare, since nothing else should be in the signal chain).

2nd screenshot is of the filter enable and the rack metering at -3.61 db.



2
Sound Design / Wind up/wind down effect.
« on: March 24, 2016, 04:20:44 pm »
I was listening to the Seven Lions track, Fractals, and was quite baffled by a couple of the sounds I was hearing. I have no idea how to describe them, so going with wind up for the first and wind down for the second seems to be the most accurate description.

Edit: In both clips, it appears like some extra audio got added to the beginning of the clips(even though it's not showing up in ableton), so the effect I am curious about is the one going on in the last half to two-thirds of both clips.

3
Sound Design / Re: Confusion around EQ'ing terminology.
« on: March 24, 2016, 04:09:03 pm »
You gotta know your tools if you want to answer that question for yourself.

I don't see how the question is a matter of knowing you tools or not.

It's in fact the difference of how tools work that you need to understand. So UNDERSTANDING your tools is a big part of using your tools.

Other wise, if you knew exactly what your eq was doing, you wouldn't of asked the question in the first place, let alone the second question that you quoted me on.

I don't see how you can not think that it's not when it clearly is the problem.

For a concrete example, let's say someone gives me the blanket advice of high-pass all kick drums at 100 Hz and low-pass all kick drums at 2 kHz. Do they mean?
a) The passband is from 100-2000 Hz.
or
b) The stopband should be from 0-200 Hz and 2 kHz-infinite, which would put the passband closer to something like 200-1500 Hz.

Not that it is a huge deal, I just want to be sure I'm speaking the same language as other folks.

I still assert that my question is unrelated to my my knowledge(or lack thereof ) of my tools. As can be clearly seen from my question, nowhere do I ask how to configure my EQ to place a passband across a frequency range(quite a trivial task). The question stems solely from my pursuit to communicate effectively with others and to remove ambiguity.

What Marrow is getting at, I think, is that the lesson from all this is that you shouldn't be taking "blanket advice", but instead understand what you're trying to achieve with said advice, and how the EQ gets you there. If we take the example of high-passing all kicks at 100Hz, if your kick's fundamental is at 100Hz, you most probably do NOT want to cut that frequency.

Thanks, Ark! Yeah, I totally understand what I should be trying to achieve with said advice. I'm just quite new to the producing community, so I just wanted to make sure I am speaking the same language as those in it.

4
Sound Design / Re: Confusion around EQ'ing terminology.
« on: March 23, 2016, 11:47:30 pm »
Hmm, seems like this post has gotten into a bit of a debate, and as a result has seemed to have gotten me even more confused :/

For a concrete example, let's say someone gives me the blanket advice of high-pass all kick drums at 100 Hz and low-pass all kick drums at 2 kHz. Do they mean?
a) The passband is from 100-2000 Hz.
or
b) The stopband should be from 0-200 Hz and 2 kHz-infinite, which would put the passband closer to something like 200-1500 Hz.

Not that it is a huge deal, I just want to be sure I'm speaking the same language as other folks.

You gotta know your tools if you want to answer that question for yourself.

I don't see how the question is a matter of knowing you tools or not.

5
Sound Design / Re: Confusion around EQ'ing terminology.
« on: March 23, 2016, 12:00:50 am »
Hmm, seems like this post has gotten into a bit of a debate, and as a result has seemed to have gotten me even more confused :/

For a concrete example, let's say someone gives me the blanket advice of high-pass all kick drums at 100 Hz and low-pass all kick drums at 2 kHz. Do they mean?
a) The passband is from 100-2000 Hz.
or
b) The stopband should be from 0-200 Hz and 2 kHz-infinite, which would put the passband closer to something like 200-1500 Hz.

Not that it is a huge deal, I just want to be sure I'm speaking the same language as other folks.

6
Hmm, thanks for the criticism, looks like I have some serious mixing changes to make...

7
Hey, Marrow Machines, sorry it appears that there is a misunderstanding somewhere.

I'm not looking for the software to actually do the correction for me, just to do the detection of where it is occurring and what frequencies are causing all in one pass, since bouncing back and forth seems to be an inefficient workflow.

8
A common problem I find myself running into during mixing is correcting for clipping in the master track. I imagine my workflow is pretty similar to most people just starting out:
  • Get all instruments sitting at a level that seems to fit.
  • Attempt to record
  • Notice a spot in the track that is clipping a few percentages of a db on master track
  • Figure out what layers are causing the clipping, and either add a little sidechain and/or adjust the levels of tracks
  • Repeat from step 2 indefinitely until all spots have been adjusted for.

Coming from a Software Engineering background, steps 2-5 strike smell to me like a process which should be automated by software to some degree. At least in regards to identifying the positions in the track which are clipping as well as frequencies which are causing clipping, while leaving the actual adjustment of the tracks up to the producer.

Basically, my ideal workflow would be something like below:
  • Get all instruments sitting at a level that seems to fit.
  • Pass master layer through some tool.
  • Tool spits provides annotation of some sort where clipping has occurred as well as frequencies responsible.
  • I go fix it up.
  • Repeat step 2 to verify that all have been fixed.

Does anybody know a tool which will do something similar, or at least will help partially automate the above process?

Cheers.

9
Awesome, thanks! Yeah I think I have found myself gravitating towards a very similar workflow :)

10
Going through tutorials, it seems like there are two ways of going about using a sidechain compressor:

1) Individually add a sidechain compressor to each component that needs one. Mr. Bill seemed to go this route in his videos.
2) Run everything that needs to have a sidechain through a single channel/bus/group, and then just add the sidechain compressor there. Virtual Riot seems to go this route in his videos.

For folks that have been producing a while, which do you prefer and why?

11
Sound Design / Re: Confusion around EQ'ing terminology.
« on: March 18, 2016, 02:46:07 pm »
Awesome, thanks all! So that means when folks are cleaning up say a lead synth, and say that they get rid of everything below 300 Hz, that actually means that they are just placing the -3db point somewhere around 300 Hz?

12
Sound Design / Confusion around EQ'ing terminology.
« on: March 17, 2016, 03:52:03 pm »
Just wanted to clear something up that's been confusing me. When people mention frequencies that that start high-passing or low-passing at, is that the frequency at which they place the frequency knob in the eq or is it the frequency which should end up getting filtered out entirely?

For the high pass filter in the attached image below, it looks like right about 4k is left unchanged, the frequency knob is set about 2k and then just below 1k is where everything will be filtered out, so which of these frequencies are folks referring to when they say I set a high pass filter at <blah> frequency? Just want to make sure I'm speaking the same language as everyone else.

13
WIPs / Re: New future bass track
« on: March 17, 2016, 04:29:18 am »
I'm really digging the arpeggio that is going throughout the track! May just be the fact that I am listening on crappy laptop speakers, but I didn't notice much of a bass layer. Besides that though really solid start :D

14
You Might Like... / Re: Porter Robinson - Flicker (Mat Zo Remix)
« on: March 17, 2016, 12:42:57 am »
Yeah, this is definitely up there for one of the best remixes of all time, IMO.

15
You Might Like... / Re: New Monstercat Producer: Introducing Loosid!
« on: March 17, 2016, 12:13:09 am »
Yeah, I saw that the other day. I have been all about the Monstercat label lately, they are churning out some really solid stuff :)

Pages: [1] 2