I thought this discussion was exactly about Avicii and his style.
Once again, my first post was about the potential of abuse when it comes people's heritage. This about traditional folk music and the fusion of a modern context. Not popular music, you people can't seem to discern the difference between the two.
Yet you still refuse to give an actual definition of what "abuse" is in this context.
The definition is clearly there if you use a dictionary and put context to the situation.
I'll spell out the bigger picture since you can't seem to grasp it.
The entire concept of modern pop has move to the way of the money rather than to genuine nature of music. You should know that by now and probably have experience it in your own way.
That's my ultimate gripe about any thing modern. I am not necessarily opposed to the modern sound, i am just more critical of the song content since i know that it'll have that "pristine" sound.
As i've stated before, i have no qualms of such music being made, but a certain amount of respect should be considered before attempting to utilize it.
It's an exploitative process for each artist to walk on their own path and reap the the harvest that is created.
quite honestly, my initial post was taken WAY out of context to begin with.
Probably should of been taken to personal message instead of derail a whole thread eh buddy boys?
